<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VCritical &#187; Windows Server 2008 R2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/tag/windows-server-2008-r2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Live Migration &#8220;significantly more complicated&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/live-migration-significantly-more-complicated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/live-migration-significantly-more-complicated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualizationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of the extra configuration -- and tools -- needed to deploy a complete Hyper-V R2 solution, eWeek concludes that VMware ESX/VMotion is simpler than Live Migration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be difficult to set up a complete Hyper-V environment.  There are <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/" target="_blank">a lot of user interfaces</a> needed to perform the various configuration tasks &#8212; especially during initial deployment.  It&#8217;s great to see that the mainstream technology media has arrived at the same conclusion.</p>
<p>Jason Brooks, Executive Editor at eWeek, <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/REVIEW-Windows-Server-2008-R2-Serves-As-Virtualization-Windows-7-Foundation-444663/1/" target="_blank">recently reviewed Windows Server 2008 R2</a> and had the following to say about Live Migration and <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/09/hands-off-that-csv/" target="_blank">Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Live Migration was very easy to use, but I found the process of configuring and using Live Migration in Windows Server 2008 R2 significantly more complicated than with VMware ESX server and VirtualCenter. In contrast to VMware&#8217;s product, where all tasks are gathered together in a purpose-built interface, the tasks required to configure Cluster Shared Volumes in Windows Server involve visits to various existing and new Windows utilities.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s true.  The Microsoft virtualization solution is a conglomeration, and configuring all of the various layers, roles, and features on top of the general-purpose Windows OS <em>is</em> complicated.</p>
<p>You may need Windows to run parts of your business, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you need Hyper-V.  Take control of Windows &#8212; by running it on rock-solid, purpose-built, enterprise-class VMware vSphere &#8212; before it takes control of you.</p>
<p><strong>Simplify, don&#8217;t complexify.</strong></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/11/scvmmpro-complexity-high/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SCVMM/PRO Complexity: High'>SCVMM/PRO Complexity: High</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/09/hands-off-that-csv/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Hands off that CSV!'>Hands off that CSV!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/12/best-of-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Best of 2009'>Best of 2009</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/hyper-v-console-disconnects-during-live-migration/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Hyper-V Console Disconnects During Live Migration'>Hyper-V Console Disconnects During Live Migration</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/live-migration-significantly-more-complicated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft announces Windows Server 2008 R2.  Again.</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualizationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being featured at numerous events, Microsoft has finally launched Windows Server 2008 R2 for the last time.  Please take a moment to acknowledge the launch -- or they may launch it again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is the big day &#8212; Windows Server 2008 R2 is generally available at last.</p>
<p>Please, take a moment to acknowledge this release.  No, really.  I mean, if Microsoft thinks there is a single person left in the free world that hasn&#8217;t heard about R2 and free Live Migration, they might be forced to produce <em>another</em> wave of announcements.</p>
<p>They may even resort to <a href="http://www.jasonschuman.com/2009/10/windows-7-house-party/" target="_blank">Tupperware-style home launch parties</a> for the server next time.  Have the neighbors bring blade servers over for that one &#8212; you know, power and cooling issues in the living room.</p>
<p>If you count beta and RC releases, this thing seems like it has been announced a dozen times already this year.  And considering that they&#8217;ve been doing battle against VMware with those unreleased products all along, counting them would not be unfair &#8212; especially considering the fanfare that accompanied each pre-release.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got it.  It&#8217;s here, it has free Live Migration, and it&#8217;s super fun.  According to some reports, R2 has even been known to whiten teeth and freshen breath.</p>
<p>So, please, acknowledge the release of R2 today.  Do it for the children.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/windows-server-2008-r2-windows-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Windows Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Windows 7?'>Windows Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Windows 7?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/07/on-quick-storage-migration-in-r2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Quick Storage Migration in R2'>On Quick Storage Migration in R2</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/hello-scvmm-2008-r2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Hello, SCVMM 2008 R2'>Hello, SCVMM 2008 R2</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2008/10/how-to-see-if-quick-migration-is-right-for-your-workload/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to see if Quick Migration is right for your workload'>How to see if Quick Migration is right for your workload</a></li>
</ol></p><div style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; background-color: #C0C0C0; padding: 7px;border: dashed thin">

<a href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/#comments">Leave a Comment</a> •
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/vcritical">Subscribe to RSS</a> •
<a href="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=vcritical&loc=en_US">Subscribe via Email</a> •
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/eric_gray">Follow Eric Gray on Twitter</a><br/>

More articles on: <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/tag/satire/" rel="tag">satire</a>, <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/tag/windows-server-2008-r2/" rel="tag">Windows Server 2008 R2</a> • <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/category/virtualizationism/">Browse All Virtualization Content</a><br/>

<a href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/">Microsoft announces Windows Server 2008 R2.  Again.</a> by <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/about/">Eric Gray</a> © 2009 • <a href="http://www.vcritical.com/">VCritical</a>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Windows 7?</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/windows-server-2008-r2-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/windows-server-2008-r2-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualizationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft released Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.  Thee technical version number for those products is not actually 7, it is 6.1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is the big launch of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2, the next major Microsoft operating system releases. A significant change this time around is the simultaneous release of the client and server.  However, I may have inadvertently uncovered the truth today:</p>
<p><strong>Windows Server 2008 R2 will not be version 7 at all!</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1859" title="Windows Server 2008 R2 - version 6.1" src="http://www.vcritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/windows-server-2008-r2-61.png" alt="Windows Server 2008 R2 - version 6.1" width="480" height="245" /></p>
<p>Actually, Windows Server 2008 R2 will be version 6.1. Will it still be binary compatible with Windows 7?</p>
<p><em>Sorry about that folks&#8230; don&#8217;t panic, <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/14/why-7.aspx" target="_blank">Windows 7</a> is version 6.1, too.<br />
</em></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/microsoft-announces-windows-server-2008-r2-again/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft announces Windows Server 2008 R2.  Again.'>Microsoft announces Windows Server 2008 R2.  Again.</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/07/wild-scvmm-2008-r2-rumors-and-speculation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Wild SCVMM 2008 R2 rumors and speculation'>Wild SCVMM 2008 R2 rumors and speculation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2010/04/what-is-red-hat-enterprise-virtualization/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What is Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization?'>What is Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.vcritical.com/2009/07/even-gpl-cant-make-hyper-v-linux-vms-well/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Even GPL can&#8217;t make Hyper-V Linux VMs well'>Even GPL can&#8217;t make Hyper-V Linux VMs well</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/windows-server-2008-r2-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
