<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux apps run directly on Windows with virtualization!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:46:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jas</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9695</link>
		<dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9695</guid>
		<description>I would prefer run Windows application on Linux OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer run Windows application on Linux OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeg M.</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9689</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeg M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9689</guid>
		<description>Nice post, but I think you missed the point of that brochure.

Look at some Microsoft market data:

server os market share: &gt;60%
client os market share &gt;90%
billions of profit year on year.

So what. If I were Microsoft, I would not need other OSs or application environments  
to provide functionality to my customers, as VMware and others do. 

Try to use ESX 4.0 completely without Windows. I think it&#039;s not reasonable, if not impossible!

So in Microsoft&#039;s view they have an OS with Hypervisor plus Applications and don&#039;t need
more. They don&#039;t need other OSs to make money. As nobody would in their position. 

Greetings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, but I think you missed the point of that brochure.</p>
<p>Look at some Microsoft market data:</p>
<p>server os market share: &gt;60%<br />
client os market share &gt;90%<br />
billions of profit year on year.</p>
<p>So what. If I were Microsoft, I would not need other OSs or application environments<br />
to provide functionality to my customers, as VMware and others do. </p>
<p>Try to use ESX 4.0 completely without Windows. I think it&#8217;s not reasonable, if not impossible!</p>
<p>So in Microsoft&#8217;s view they have an OS with Hypervisor plus Applications and don&#8217;t need<br />
more. They don&#8217;t need other OSs to make money. As nobody would in their position. </p>
<p>Greetings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave O.</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9688</guid>
		<description>This is hiliarous. Thanks for the laugh, Eric!

I about fell out of my chair, as well, when I saw the Command Prompt window and you trying to run &quot;rpm -Uvh&quot;.

BTW, what about the lovely Palo Alto bowl right next to Dinah&#039;s...did they have power? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hiliarous. Thanks for the laugh, Eric!</p>
<p>I about fell out of my chair, as well, when I saw the Command Prompt window and you trying to run &#8220;rpm -Uvh&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, what about the lovely Palo Alto bowl right next to Dinah&#8217;s&#8230;did they have power? <img src='http://www.vcritical.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougBaer</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>DougBaer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9686</guid>
		<description>I just about fell out of my chair this morning when I read this. I came across the MS marketing doc on Tuesday and sent this diagram to my team along with a Marketing vs. Reality rant. Thanks for the entertainment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just about fell out of my chair this morning when I read this. I came across the MS marketing doc on Tuesday and sent this diagram to my team along with a Marketing vs. Reality rant. Thanks for the entertainment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9685</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9685</guid>
		<description>Maybe they wrote this from the southern hemisphere marketing department...it is summer after all which requires less layers....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they wrote this from the southern hemisphere marketing department&#8230;it is summer after all which requires less layers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin C. MacMillan</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin C. MacMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>With Hyper-V, why not just double-down and use Kate instead of that WordPad cruft:

    rpm -Uvh kate-4.3.1-3.7.x86_64.rpm

Mmmm! That&#039;s good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Hyper-V, why not just double-down and use Kate instead of that WordPad cruft:</p>
<p>    rpm -Uvh kate-4.3.1-3.7.x86_64.rpm</p>
<p>Mmmm! That&#8217;s good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9683</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9683</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, but 25% fewer layers than VMware is no joke.  This is serious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, but 25% fewer layers than VMware is no joke.  This is serious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9682</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9682</guid>
		<description>IPv6 is not a problem, since Windows and Hyper-V are already RFC-compliant.

The trick is to grab a recent 2.6 kernel module and load it as usual:

# modprobe ipv6

The rest is straightforward, but remember to use WordPad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPv6 is not a problem, since Windows and Hyper-V are already RFC-compliant.</p>
<p>The trick is to grab a recent 2.6 kernel module and load it as usual:</p>
<p># modprobe ipv6</p>
<p>The rest is straightforward, but remember to use WordPad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9681</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9681</guid>
		<description>Awesome!  One layer.  Beat that, VMware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!  One layer.  Beat that, VMware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2010/02/linux-apps-run-directly-on-windows-with-virtualization/#comment-9680</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=2339#comment-9680</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jason.  Today would be a good day to go bowling since there is no power on the VMware Palo Alto campus. Lemme know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jason.  Today would be a good day to go bowling since there is no power on the VMware Palo Alto campus. Lemme know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
