<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which 50% will you virtualize?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: latoga labs &#124; Virtualization Round Up 20091120</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-9035</link>
		<dc:creator>latoga labs &#124; Virtualization Round Up 20091120</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-9035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Which 50% Will You Virtualize? Some interesting thoughts on statements made about Hyper-V R2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which 50% Will You Virtualize? Some interesting thoughts on statements made about Hyper-V R2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian K</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8877</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My company is at 80% of x86 based OS instances are virtual today.    We aim to hit close to 90+% in the next 18 months.   50% as a goal is so 4 years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company is at 80% of x86 based OS instances are virtual today.    We aim to hit close to 90+% in the next 18 months.   50% as a goal is so 4 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8776</link>
		<dc:creator>william bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric, I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right....  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right&#8230;.  <img src='http://www.vcritical.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8745</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William, thank you for clarifying.  I&#039;m sure your environment is the exception for Hyper-V-appropriate workloads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, thank you for clarifying.  I&#8217;m sure your environment is the exception for Hyper-V-appropriate workloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8616</link>
		<dc:creator>william bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should specify, it tends to die under high workload in OUR testing so far...Don&#039;t want them thinking I am impugning the quality of their software.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should specify, it tends to die under high workload in OUR testing so far&#8230;Don&#8217;t want them thinking I am impugning the quality of their software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8612</link>
		<dc:creator>william bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course microsoft would say that, their product can only support about 40-50% of workloads (hyperv tends to die under workload). We&#039;re looking at hitting around 95 percent. The only reason for the 5%? Freaking fax cards and dongles that won&#039;t work. I&#039;ve already got multiterabye databases that run many, many, many thousands of iops a second....On blades to boot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course microsoft would say that, their product can only support about 40-50% of workloads (hyperv tends to die under workload). We&#8217;re looking at hitting around 95 percent. The only reason for the 5%? Freaking fax cards and dongles that won&#8217;t work. I&#8217;ve already got multiterabye databases that run many, many, many thousands of iops a second&#8230;.On blades to boot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobSF</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>RobSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My employer is virtualization-first. Physical servers are becoming rather rare....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My employer is virtualization-first. Physical servers are becoming rather rare&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by eric_gray: VCritical: Which 50% will you virtualize? http://bit.ly/1XyWxh...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by eric_gray: VCritical: Which 50% will you virtualize? <a href="http://bit.ly/1XyWxh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1XyWxh</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Which 50% will you virtualize? &#124; VCritical -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/10/which-50-will-you-virtualize/#comment-8535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Which 50% will you virtualize? &#124; VCritical -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1884#comment-8535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Kelly and Damien Sheridan, Teddy Ostergaard. Teddy Ostergaard said: Which 50% will you virtualize?: PC World recently published an article on Hyper-V R2 competing with VMware vSph.. http://bit.ly/3f9SHx [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Kelly and Damien Sheridan, Teddy Ostergaard. Teddy Ostergaard said: Which 50% will you virtualize?: PC World recently published an article on Hyper-V R2 competing with VMware vSph.. <a href="http://bit.ly/3f9SHx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3f9SHx</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
