<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Pane of Glass &#8212; Hyper-V Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-11171</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-11171</guid>
		<description>Thanks, glad you liked it.  I&#039;m not surprised it takes your crew much longer to set up Hyper-V POC, it is just much more complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, glad you liked it.  I&#8217;m not surprised it takes your crew much longer to set up Hyper-V POC, it is just much more complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eiad Al-Aqqad</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-11167</link>
		<dc:creator>Eiad Al-Aqqad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-11167</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,

Great post as usual. What I have really loved here how you made Microsoft shoot them self in the foot and admit that they have a horrible setup complication. one year after your post and they still suffer the same setup complexity. I see it every where that my company go to conduct a POC of both products. Our VMware team can close a POC in two days, where our Hyper-V team take a minimum of a week. This has been repeated and even when Microsoft is directly involved in the POC it does not shorten the gap much.

Regards,
Eiad Al-Aqqad
http://www.VirtualizationTeam.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>Great post as usual. What I have really loved here how you made Microsoft shoot them self in the foot and admit that they have a horrible setup complication. one year after your post and they still suffer the same setup complexity. I see it every where that my company go to conduct a POC of both products. Our VMware team can close a POC in two days, where our Hyper-V team take a minimum of a week. This has been repeated and even when Microsoft is directly involved in the POC it does not shorten the gap much.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Eiad Al-Aqqad<br />
<a href="http://www.VirtualizationTeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.VirtualizationTeam.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who’s Using Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V? &#171; vTeardown</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-9712</link>
		<dc:creator>Who’s Using Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V? &#171; vTeardown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-9712</guid>
		<description>[...] Essentials for Hyper-V? If you’re a Hyper-V administrator, don’t you already have tons of management applications to deal with?  Having another application to manage your back-end storage would just add to the complexity. If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Essentials for Hyper-V? If you’re a Hyper-V administrator, don’t you already have tons of management applications to deal with?  Having another application to manage your back-end storage would just add to the complexity. If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eWeek Finds Hyper-V Live Migration Significantly More Complicated than VMware VMotion &#124; VCritical</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-8434</link>
		<dc:creator>eWeek Finds Hyper-V Live Migration Significantly More Complicated than VMware VMotion &#124; VCritical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-8434</guid>
		<description>[...] can be difficult to set up a complete Hyper-V environment.  There are a lot of user interfaces needed to perform the various configuration tasks &#8212; especially during initial deployment.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can be difficult to set up a complete Hyper-V environment.  There are a lot of user interfaces needed to perform the various configuration tasks &#8212; especially during initial deployment.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7449</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7449</guid>
		<description>Eric, don&#039;t underestimate the power of the software bundle. If a company has SA in place (Microsoft Software Assurance), then the package of all the System Center products is pretty cheap. There&#039;s a System Center Essentials bundle (small companies) as well as a System Center Enterprise option (large environments).

It becomes a hard sell if you&#039;re already paying for this and want to use or keep on using VMware products. 

I agree that the large set of tools required and the additional requirements (clustering, Windows domain membership for your hypervisor) can and will be a pain. It also requires some very good IT people to setup properly.

But the decision makers don&#039;t care about that, they only look at their spreadsheets. And the IT guy has to suffer. I recently talked to someone who hinted at this. He got some students for a SCOM course who have been going through this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, don&#8217;t underestimate the power of the software bundle. If a company has SA in place (Microsoft Software Assurance), then the package of all the System Center products is pretty cheap. There&#8217;s a System Center Essentials bundle (small companies) as well as a System Center Enterprise option (large environments).</p>
<p>It becomes a hard sell if you&#8217;re already paying for this and want to use or keep on using VMware products. </p>
<p>I agree that the large set of tools required and the additional requirements (clustering, Windows domain membership for your hypervisor) can and will be a pain. It also requires some very good IT people to setup properly.</p>
<p>But the decision makers don&#8217;t care about that, they only look at their spreadsheets. And the IT guy has to suffer. I recently talked to someone who hinted at this. He got some students for a SCOM course who have been going through this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Soled</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Soled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7426</guid>
		<description>If you want to use SCOM 2007 and do some management and monitoring of your VMware environment, ditch the SCVMM and go with the nWorks Management Pack for VMware (nWorks now part of Veeam Software).   http://www.veeam.com/vmware-microsoft-esx-monitoring.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to use SCOM 2007 and do some management and monitoring of your VMware environment, ditch the SCVMM and go with the nWorks Management Pack for VMware (nWorks now part of Veeam Software).   <a href="http://www.veeam.com/vmware-microsoft-esx-monitoring.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.veeam.com/vmware-microsoft-esx-monitoring.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7414</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7414</guid>
		<description>Some people &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; choose Hyper-V.  Looks like you are one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people <em>will</em> choose Hyper-V.  Looks like you are one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Low cost with high SLA</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>Low cost with high SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7412</guid>
		<description>Wow, clearly an exaggeration just to make a point for the author&#039;s favorite team and a waste of our time.

If I already own hundreds of copies of Windows Server 2008 R2 then I have hundreds of copies of a hypervisor at my disposal. Why should I continue to direct my shrinking budget on VMware when I can leverage what I already own and it is good enough to meet my needs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, clearly an exaggeration just to make a point for the author&#8217;s favorite team and a waste of our time.</p>
<p>If I already own hundreds of copies of Windows Server 2008 R2 then I have hundreds of copies of a hypervisor at my disposal. Why should I continue to direct my shrinking budget on VMware when I can leverage what I already own and it is good enough to meet my needs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7344</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7344</guid>
		<description>I am curious, what does mister Muglia have to say about your findings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious, what does mister Muglia have to say about your findings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/08/single-pane-of-glass-hyper-v-edition/#comment-7265</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1339#comment-7265</guid>
		<description>Beautiful re-definition of single pane of glass :-)
I can&#039;t stop laughing on the picture !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful re-definition of single pane of glass <img src='http://www.vcritical.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I can&#8217;t stop laughing on the picture !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

