<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choose any two: Hyper-V, HA, Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:29:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>Well, Boris, that is a very interesting suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Boris, that is a very interesting suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Sirotin</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-7191</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Sirotin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-7191</guid>
		<description>Simple temporary solution - just put bootable CD in the Linux VM. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple temporary solution &#8211; just put bootable CD in the Linux VM. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6992</guid>
		<description>Aubrey, glad you found it useful thanks for the affirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aubrey, glad you found it useful thanks for the affirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey Vman Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6982</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey Vman Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6982</guid>
		<description>Great info!  I really feel for those that will be fooled by Microsoft&#039;s woefully inadequate virtualization product billed as &quot;Free&quot;.  

In my environment, we have to have a mature and lean V-platform that supports both MS and Linux flavors with the full suite of benefits provided, regardless of OS.

ESX 3.5 and 4 is now leaps and bounds ahead of where Softzilla is and I see no credible evidence of that gap closing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info!  I really feel for those that will be fooled by Microsoft&#8217;s woefully inadequate virtualization product billed as &#8220;Free&#8221;.  </p>
<p>In my environment, we have to have a mature and lean V-platform that supports both MS and Linux flavors with the full suite of benefits provided, regardless of OS.</p>
<p>ESX 3.5 and 4 is now leaps and bounds ahead of where Softzilla is and I see no credible evidence of that gap closing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6805</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6805</guid>
		<description>To not mention Linux guests supports only 1 vCPU. Which is huge shown-stopper for many companies.

I guess MS will not work hard to make Linux guest to shine on Hyper-V. Don&#039;t need to mention the reasons :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To not mention Linux guests supports only 1 vCPU. Which is huge shown-stopper for many companies.</p>
<p>I guess MS will not work hard to make Linux guest to shine on Hyper-V. Don&#8217;t need to mention the reasons <img src='http://www.vcritical.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladan</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is still not ready for real world virtualization. For now,  it&#039;s good to do a homelab with Hyper-V, do some testing, but the system itself it seems to be more &quot;heavy&quot; then VMware. The density of VM&#039;s is not great either... 

I&#039;m slowly discovering ESX 4 and I can clearly see that vSphere 4 is more &quot;light&quot; than ESX 3.... and much more &quot;mature&quot; than Hyper-V...

Great read Eric,

Cheers,
Vladan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is still not ready for real world virtualization. For now,  it&#8217;s good to do a homelab with Hyper-V, do some testing, but the system itself it seems to be more &#8220;heavy&#8221; then VMware. The density of VM&#8217;s is not great either&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m slowly discovering ESX 4 and I can clearly see that vSphere 4 is more &#8220;light&#8221; than ESX 3&#8230;. and much more &#8220;mature&#8221; than Hyper-V&#8230;</p>
<p>Great read Eric,</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Vladan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyper-V: Do you want to run HA OR Linux? &#124; VMGuru.nl - I choose (a virtual) life!</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6801</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyper-V: Do you want to run HA OR Linux? &#124; VMGuru.nl - I choose (a virtual) life!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6801</guid>
		<description>[...] checked my missed twitter messages and a retweet from Duncap Epping caught my eye. It was a link to an article from Eric Gray on vCritical about HA for Linux guests on Hyper-V. Now you will probably think, nice an HA for Linux on Hyper-V [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] checked my missed twitter messages and a retweet from Duncap Epping caught my eye. It was a link to an article from Eric Gray on vCritical about HA for Linux guests on Hyper-V. Now you will probably think, nice an HA for Linux on Hyper-V [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>Ben, that&#039;s good to know, thanks for the information.

Congratulations on your new son.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, that&#8217;s good to know, thanks for the information.</p>
<p>Congratulations on your new son.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2009/06/choose-any-two-hyper-v-ha-linux/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=1180#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,

Yes,  this is a sore point that we have heard about from customers today.  In Windows Server 2008 R2 we will be making changes to how clustered virtual machines are managed, so that at least the third option will work.  Unfortunately the first two approaches will continue to fail in the manner you have outlined (for now).

Cheers,
Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>Yes,  this is a sore point that we have heard about from customers today.  In Windows Server 2008 R2 we will be making changes to how clustered virtual machines are managed, so that at least the third option will work.  Unfortunately the first two approaches will continue to fail in the manner you have outlined (for now).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
