<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks for all the port groups!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/</link>
	<description>Informed Virtualization Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to recover from the modifications made to vCenter by SCVMM &#124; VCritical</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>How to recover from the modifications made to vCenter by SCVMM &#124; VCritical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=362#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] groups that SCVMM created when managing your VMware ESX VMs.  I covered this in more detail in a previous article.  Essentially, the SCVMM interface presents vSwitches, not port groups.  It then creates one or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] groups that SCVMM created when managing your VMware ESX VMs.  I covered this in more detail in a previous article.  Essentially, the SCVMM interface presents vSwitches, not port groups.  It then creates one or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=362#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I have no visibility into that, but if history is a guide the integration would be minimal at best.

You would be happy because you intend to use SCVMM with VMware?  I would be interested in hearing your perspective on this, if you don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no visibility into that, but if history is a guide the integration would be minimal at best.</p>
<p>You would be happy because you intend to use SCVMM with VMware?  I would be interested in hearing your perspective on this, if you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph Wegener</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Wegener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=362#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I will be interested to know if Microsofts plans on integrating the upcoming VI4 and the Cisco Nexus 1000V.
I would bet they wont fully integrate. But I would be happy to be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be interested to know if Microsofts plans on integrating the upcoming VI4 and the Cisco Nexus 1000V.<br />
I would bet they wont fully integrate. But I would be happy to be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=362#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, no.  As far as I can tell, SCVMM will create one new port group per vSwitch per VLAN (times 32).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, no.  As far as I can tell, SCVMM will create one new port group per vSwitch per VLAN (times 32).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.vcritical.com/2008/12/thanks-for-all-the-port-groups/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vcritical.com/?p=362#comment-177</guid>
		<description>So in a 32 host cluster with a couple of 100 vm&#039;s this would mean a couple of 100 portgroups? and probably a lot with the same vlan ID. would be a nice environment to do troubleshooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in a 32 host cluster with a couple of 100 vm&#8217;s this would mean a couple of 100 portgroups? and probably a lot with the same vlan ID. would be a nice environment to do troubleshooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

